Le 23/03/2011 22:13, Leonardo Borda a écrit :
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Thank you for answering my question.
> Actually this is what I want to achieve:
>
> eth0----+ +----bond0.100----br0-100---{+virtual machines
> | |
> +----bond0----+----br0---(LAN)
> | |
> eth1----+ +----bond0.200----br0-200---{+virtual machines
Hi Leonardo,
I'm not sure recent kernels allow for a given interface to be a port for a
bridge and the base
interface for vlan interfaces at the same time. This might be particularly true
for 2.6.38 or
2.6.38+, because of the new rx_handler usage.
cc: netdev and Jiri Pirko, for advices. For the history of the thread, see:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1300914794.32252.68.camel%40bordalnx&;
forum_name=bonding-devel
> br0 --> br0 in my understanding is an untagged vlan therefore it
> provides access to my LAN. So i am able to access that server from my
> internal network.
> br0-100 and br0-200 -> Vlans over a bridged interface will allow me to
> have many virtual machines in the same vlan on each bridged interface.
>
> I am misunderstanding concepts, maybe?
> If you need to do further tests I have a test environment ready for use.
>
> Leonardo
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
