On 14/12/2012 08:23, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:19:04 +0800
> Ang Way Chuang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 14/12/2012 08:12, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:07:01 +0800
>>> Ang Way Chuang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This patch fixes the incorrect interpretation of endianness of MLDv2
>>>> maximum response
>>>> code within bridge's multicast snooping code.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ang Way Chuang <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
>>>> index 977c3ee..29c6283 100644
>>>> --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
>>>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
>>>> @@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ static int br_ip6_multicast_query(struct net_bridge
>>>> *br,
>>>> mld2q = (struct mld2_query *)icmp6_hdr(skb);
>>>> if (!mld2q->mld2q_nsrcs)
>>>> group = &mld2q->mld2q_mca;
>>>> - max_delay = mld2q->mld2q_mrc ? MLDV2_MRC(mld2q->mld2q_mrc) : 1;
>>>> + max_delay = mld2q->mld2q_mrc ?
>>>> MLDV2_MRC(ntohs(mld2q->mld2q_mrc)) : 1;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> if (!group)
>>> Already fixed as part of my patch to fix sparse warnings.
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>>> the body of a message to [email protected]
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>> aye, aye.
> Yours looks cleaner (I added a temp variable). You might want to submit
> patch to switch to your oneline version.
>
Well, the patch did get into the netdev mailing list. I think your direct reply
arrived in my mailbox first before I received my own patch through netdev. By
the way, I don't see your patch on net-next git. Otherwise, I wouldn't have
gone through the trouble of debugging and testing it on my computer. Is there
any other repo that I should watch out to avoid this kind of silly situation in
the future?
