On 25/07/2019 16:06, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 25/07/2019 14:44, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
>> There is no way to configure the bridge, to receive only specific link
>> layer multicast addresses. From the description of the command 'bridge
>> fdb append' is supposed to do that, but there was no way to notify the
>> network driver that the bridge joined a group, because LLADDR was added
>> to the unicast netdev_hw_addr_list.
>>
>> Therefore update fdb_add_entry to check if the NLM_F_APPEND flag is set
>> and if the source is NULL, which represent the bridge itself. Then add
>> address to multicast netdev_hw_addr_list for each bridge interfaces.
>> And then the .ndo_set_rx_mode function on the driver is called. To notify
>> the driver that the list of multicast mac addresses changed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> Hi,
> I'm sorry but this patch is wrong on many levels, some notes below. In general
> NLM_F_APPEND is only used in vxlan, the bridge does not handle that flag at 
> all.
> FDB is only for *unicast*, nothing is joined and no multicast should be used 
> with fdbs.
> MDB is used for multicast handling, but both of these are used for forwarding.
> The reason the static fdbs are added to the filter is for non-promisc ports, 
> so they can
> receive traffic destined for these FDBs for forwarding.
> If you'd like to join any multicast group please use the standard way, if 
> you'd like to join
> it only on a specific port - join it only on that port (or ports) and the 
> bridge and you'll

And obviously this is for the case where you're not enabling port promisc mode 
(non-default).
In general you'll only need to join the group on the bridge to receive traffic 
for it
or add it as an mdb entry to forward it.

> have the effect that you're describing. What do you mean there's no way ?
> 
> In addition you're allowing a mix of mcast functions to be called with 
> unicast addresses
> and vice versa, it is not that big of a deal because the kernel will simply 
> return an error
> but still makes no sense.
> 
> Nacked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>
> 
>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
>> index b1d3248..d93746d 100644
>> --- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
>> @@ -175,6 +175,29 @@ static void fdb_add_hw_addr(struct net_bridge *br, 
>> const unsigned char *addr)
>>      }
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void fdb_add_hw_maddr(struct net_bridge *br, const unsigned char 
>> *addr)
>> +{
>> +    int err;
>> +    struct net_bridge_port *p;
>> +
>> +    ASSERT_RTNL();
>> +
>> +    list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list) {
>> +            if (!br_promisc_port(p)) {
>> +                    err = dev_mc_add(p->dev, addr);
>> +                    if (err)
>> +                            goto undo;
>> +            }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return;
>> +undo:
>> +    list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(p, &br->port_list, list) {
>> +            if (!br_promisc_port(p))
>> +                    dev_mc_del(p->dev, addr);
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>>  /* When a static FDB entry is deleted, the HW address from that entry is
>>   * also removed from the bridge private HW address list and updates all
>>   * the ports with needed information.
>> @@ -192,13 +215,27 @@ static void fdb_del_hw_addr(struct net_bridge *br, 
>> const unsigned char *addr)
>>      }
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void fdb_del_hw_maddr(struct net_bridge *br, const unsigned char 
>> *addr)
>> +{
>> +    struct net_bridge_port *p;
>> +
>> +    ASSERT_RTNL();
>> +
>> +    list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list) {
>> +            if (!br_promisc_port(p))
>> +                    dev_mc_del(p->dev, addr);
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void fdb_delete(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_fdb_entry 
>> *f,
>>                     bool swdev_notify)
>>  {
>>      trace_fdb_delete(br, f);
>>  
>> -    if (f->is_static)
>> +    if (f->is_static) {
>>              fdb_del_hw_addr(br, f->key.addr.addr);
>> +            fdb_del_hw_maddr(br, f->key.addr.addr);
> 
> Walking over all ports again for each static delete is a no-go.
> 
>> +    }
>>  
>>      hlist_del_init_rcu(&f->fdb_node);
>>      rhashtable_remove_fast(&br->fdb_hash_tbl, &f->rhnode,
>> @@ -843,13 +880,19 @@ static int fdb_add_entry(struct net_bridge *br, struct 
>> net_bridge_port *source,
>>                      fdb->is_local = 1;
>>                      if (!fdb->is_static) {
>>                              fdb->is_static = 1;
>> -                            fdb_add_hw_addr(br, addr);
>> +                            if (flags & NLM_F_APPEND && !source)
>> +                                    fdb_add_hw_maddr(br, addr);
>> +                            else
>> +                                    fdb_add_hw_addr(br, addr);
>>                      }
>>              } else if (state & NUD_NOARP) {
>>                      fdb->is_local = 0;
>>                      if (!fdb->is_static) {
>>                              fdb->is_static = 1;
>> -                            fdb_add_hw_addr(br, addr);
>> +                            if (flags & NLM_F_APPEND && !source)
>> +                                    fdb_add_hw_maddr(br, addr);
>> +                            else
>> +                                    fdb_add_hw_addr(br, addr);
>>                      }
>>              } else {
>>                      fdb->is_local = 0;
>>
> 

Reply via email to