> Hi, > This patch-set is inappropriate for -net, if at all. It's quite late over > here and I'll > review the rest later, but I can say from a quick peek that patch 02 is > unacceptable for it increases the complexity with 1 order of magnitude of all > add/del call paths and some of them can be invoked on user packets. A lot of > this functionality should be "hidden" in the driver or done by a user-space > daemon/helper. > Most of the flooding behaviour changes must be hidden behind some new > option otherwise they'll break user setups that rely on the current. I'll > review > the patches in detail over the following few days, net-next is closed anyway. > > Cheers, > Nik
Hi Nik, Thanks for your quick response! Once you have a chance to review the set, please let me know how I can improve them to make them acceptable. These are real problems and we do need to fix them. Thanks, Joseph
