2021년 8월 23일 (월) 오후 6:00, Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>님이 작성: > > On 23/08/2021 09:19, Kangmin Park wrote: > > This changes behaviour though, I don't like changing code just for the sake > of it. > Perhaps the author had a reason to use hwaccel_put_tag instead. Before we > would > just put hwaccel tag, now if there already is hwaccel tag we'll push it inside > the skb and then push the new tag in hwaccel. In fact I think you can even > trigger > the warning inside skb_vlan_push, so: > > Nacked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]> > >
Thanks for the review. I got it. Then, how about cleanup by changing return type of br_handle_ingress_vlan_tunnel()? This function is only referenced in br_handle_frame(), and goto drop when it return non-zero. But, the ingress function always return 0, there is no meaning for now. If you think the cleanup is worth it, I'll send you a v2 patch. Regards.
