Eric Woudstra <ericwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is using 'meta nfproto ipv4' instead an option? This looks at > pkt->state->pf, which holds the correct value, not at skb->protcol.
pf is NFPROTO_BRIDGE.
Eric Woudstra <ericwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is using 'meta nfproto ipv4' instead an option? This looks at > pkt->state->pf, which holds the correct value, not at skb->protcol.
pf is NFPROTO_BRIDGE.