在 2025/8/12 14:10, Ido Schimmel 写道:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 05:18:18PM +0800, Wang Liang wrote:
When set multicast_query_interval to a large value, the local variable
'time' in br_multicast_send_query() may overflow. If the time is smaller
than jiffies, the timer will expire immediately, and then call mod_timer()
again, which creates a loop and may trigger the following soft lockup
issue.

   watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 221s! [rb_consumer:66]
   CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 66 Comm: rb_consumer Not tainted 6.16.0+ #259 
PREEMPT(none)
   Call Trace:
    <IRQ>
    __netdev_alloc_skb+0x2e/0x3a0
    br_ip6_multicast_alloc_query+0x212/0x1b70
    __br_multicast_send_query+0x376/0xac0
    br_multicast_send_query+0x299/0x510
    br_multicast_query_expired.constprop.0+0x16d/0x1b0
    call_timer_fn+0x3b/0x2a0
    __run_timers+0x619/0x950
    run_timer_softirq+0x11c/0x220
    handle_softirqs+0x18e/0x560
    __irq_exit_rcu+0x158/0x1a0
    sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x76/0x90
    </IRQ>

This issue can be reproduced with:
   ip link add br0 type bridge
   echo 1 > /sys/class/net/br0/bridge/multicast_querier
   echo 0xffffffffffffffff >
        /sys/class/net/br0/bridge/multicast_query_interval
   ip link set dev br0 up

The multicast_startup_query_interval can also cause this issue. Similar to
the commit 99b40610956a("net: bridge: mcast: add and enforce query interval
                          ^ missing space

minimum"), add check for the query interval maximum to fix this issue.

Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/
Fixes: 7e4df51eb35d ("bridge: netlink: add support for igmp's intervals")
Probably doesn't matter in practice given how old both commits are, but
I think you should blame d902eee43f19 ("bridge: Add multicast
count/interval sysfs entries") instead. The commit message also uses the
sysfs path and not the netlink one.


Thanks for your suggestions!

The bug fix tag is really important. I will correct it and send a new patch later.

Suggested-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wang Liang <[email protected]>
Code looks fine to me.

Reply via email to