Currently neigh ha address is read directly, but that can result in
torn/partial reads if the neigh is being updated. Use neigh_ha_snapshot
to take a stable snapshot of the address.
Fixes: 057658cb33fb ("bridge: suppress arp pkts on BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS ports")
Fixes: ed842faeb2bd ("bridge: suppress nd pkts on BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS ports")
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>
---
v2: - use ETH_ALEN instead of MAX_ADDR_LEN, the bridge devices all use
ETH_ALEN and vxlan allows arp/nd reduce only when not in raw/gpe
so it also always uses ETH_ALEN
- align ha to 2 bytes because ether_addr_copy() expects it (Sashiko)
net/bridge/br_arp_nd_proxy.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_arp_nd_proxy.c b/net/bridge/br_arp_nd_proxy.c
index 23eb6931a2b4..fd65d6af4f35 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_arp_nd_proxy.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_arp_nd_proxy.c
@@ -195,13 +195,15 @@ void br_do_proxy_suppress_arp(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
net_bridge *br,
n = neigh_lookup(&arp_tbl, &tip, vlandev);
if (n) {
struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *f;
+ u8 ha[ETH_ALEN] __aligned(2);
if (!(READ_ONCE(n->nud_state) & NUD_VALID)) {
neigh_release(n);
return;
}
- f = br_fdb_find_rcu(br, n->ha, vid);
+ neigh_ha_snapshot(ha, n, n->dev);
+ f = br_fdb_find_rcu(br, ha, vid);
if (f) {
const struct net_bridge_port *dst = READ_ONCE(f->dst);
bool replied = false;
@@ -211,10 +213,10 @@ void br_do_proxy_suppress_arp(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
net_bridge *br,
br_is_neigh_suppress_enabled(dst, vid)) {
if (!vid)
br_arp_send(br, p, skb->dev, sip, tip,
- sha, n->ha, sha, 0, 0);
+ sha, ha, sha, 0, 0);
else
br_arp_send(br, p, skb->dev, sip, tip,
- sha, n->ha, sha,
+ sha, ha, sha,
skb->vlan_proto,
skb_vlan_tag_get(skb));
replied = true;
@@ -252,7 +254,7 @@ struct nd_msg *br_is_nd_neigh_msg(const struct sk_buff
*skb, struct nd_msg *msg)
}
static void br_nd_send(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
- struct sk_buff *request, struct neighbour *n,
+ struct sk_buff *request, struct neighbour *n, u8 *ha,
__be16 vlan_proto, u16 vlan_tci)
{
struct net_device *dev = request->dev;
@@ -310,7 +312,7 @@ static void br_nd_send(struct net_bridge *br, struct
net_bridge_port *p,
ipv6_eth_mc_map(&in6addr_linklocal_allnodes,
eth_hdr(reply)->h_dest);
else
ether_addr_copy(eth_hdr(reply)->h_dest, daddr);
- ether_addr_copy(eth_hdr(reply)->h_source, n->ha);
+ ether_addr_copy(eth_hdr(reply)->h_source, ha);
eth_hdr(reply)->h_proto = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
reply->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
@@ -340,7 +342,7 @@ static void br_nd_send(struct net_bridge *br, struct
net_bridge_port *p,
na->icmph.icmp6_override = 1;
na->icmph.icmp6_solicited = dad ? 0 : 1;
na->target = ns->target;
- ether_addr_copy(&na->opt[2], n->ha);
+ ether_addr_copy(&na->opt[2], ha);
na->opt[0] = ND_OPT_TARGET_LL_ADDR;
na->opt[1] = na_olen >> 3;
@@ -369,7 +371,7 @@ static void br_nd_send(struct net_bridge *br, struct
net_bridge_port *p,
__vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(reply, vlan_proto, vlan_tci);
netdev_dbg(dev, "nd send dev %s dst %pI6 dst_hw %pM src %pI6 src_hw
%pM\n",
- dev->name, &pip6->daddr, daddr, &pip6->saddr, n->ha);
+ dev->name, &pip6->daddr, daddr, &pip6->saddr, ha);
if (p) {
dev_queue_xmit(reply);
@@ -472,24 +474,26 @@ void br_do_suppress_nd(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
net_bridge *br,
n = neigh_lookup(&nd_tbl, &msg->target, vlandev);
if (n) {
struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *f;
+ u8 ha[ETH_ALEN] __aligned(2);
if (!(READ_ONCE(n->nud_state) & NUD_VALID)) {
neigh_release(n);
return;
}
- f = br_fdb_find_rcu(br, n->ha, vid);
+ neigh_ha_snapshot(ha, n, n->dev);
+ f = br_fdb_find_rcu(br, ha, vid);
if (f) {
const struct net_bridge_port *dst = READ_ONCE(f->dst);
bool replied = false;
if (br_is_neigh_suppress_enabled(dst, vid)) {
if (vid != 0)
- br_nd_send(br, p, skb, n,
+ br_nd_send(br, p, skb, n, ha,
skb->vlan_proto,
skb_vlan_tag_get(skb));
else
- br_nd_send(br, p, skb, n, 0, 0);
+ br_nd_send(br, p, skb, n, ha, 0, 0);
replied = true;
}
--
2.47.3
