On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 17:10 -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:29:29 +1100 > Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No, let's just fix them all. > > In tree, yes. But leaving the NF_HOOK()/NF_HOOK_THRESH() compat > macros in there for out-of-tree modules I feel is mandatory, it's > a major API change.
I'm not so sure. The hook functions which are registered, sure (ie. keep the calling convention the same). But do any external modules use NF_HOOK()? That implies they're writing their own network stack for some protocol, which I would expect to be uncommon. Rusty. -- A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver -- Richard Braakman
_______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
