In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Adrian Bunk writes: >Letting CONFIG_BRIDGE depend on CONFIG_ATM doesn't sound like a good >idea, since I doubt all people using the Bridge code require ATM >support.
i agree. >Moving the hooks to the bridge code will give you exactly the same >problems the other way round. how about moving them to a third location like net/core/dev.c?
_______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
