On Mon, 30 May 2005 11:38:59 +0200 Louis Croisez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > i want to implement the bridging feature on an arm (cpu intel ixp425), > running busybox+linux kernel 2.6.11. > For this, I have recompiled the kernel to enable bridging and ebtables, and > I have compiled and installed brctl utility for arm. > > Here is my network setup: > [PC_A] eth0 10.0.0.10/24 ======== eth0 --+-- eth1 ======== [PC_B] eth0 > 10.10.0.1/24 > | > br0 > [ARM] What is IP address of bridge? (br0) or do you not want the ARM box to be IP accessible? > > Here is how I setup my bridge on the ARM: > brctl addbr br0 > brctl addif br0 eth0 > brctl addif br0 eth1 > brctl setfd br0 1 why set forwarding delay so low, please don't > ifconfig eth0 promisc Don't do this you don't need to, unless something is broken in driver. > ifconfig eth1 promisc > ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0> What is http:// stuff? some filter got it? expect: ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 to bring up without IP address > ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0> > ifconfig eth0 up unneeded device is already up. > ifconfig eth1 up > ifconfig br0 0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0> You forgot to assign IP address to bridge, expect: ifconfig br0 > ifconfig br0 up Likewise unneeded. > ip route add 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0> dev br0 In addition to configuration issues, I would also suspect the ARM ethernet driver. Possible issues: 1) Does each ethernet device have a valid unique ethernet address? (ifconfig -a) 2) Does promiscuous work correctly? Can you snoop the net correctly with tcpdump without the bridge and without forcing eth into promiscuous mode.
_______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
