On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 02:55:47PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On 9/11/06, David Kimdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David,
> 
> It looks like this code specifically ignores (which is OK for now) and
> clears (which is not OK) the frame's 802.1p priority.i

ah, yes, good point.

>   Have you tested
> priority-tagged frames to see if they are passed correctly?  

well, they get mapped to the correct vlan (untagged), but, yes, we
lose the priority.  

> Something like this would probably be fine:
yes, thanks.

-David

_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge

Reply via email to