On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 01:32:41AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> While the bridging functionality itself is okay, it logs a lot (too much
> IMHO), it threw >4 MB of logs in a couple of minutes with low traffic.
The bridging itself shouldn't log anything. What kind of logs do you get?
> I tried various of the services the bridge provides from within the LAN,
> FTP and WWW were fine, I could ping the bridge, but NFS (UDP) did not
> work, for reasons I cannot see. In all iptables (filter, nat, mangle)
> have only been the default chains, which all were empty with a default
> policy of ACCEPT.
Uhm.. do you have connection tracking loaded bychance? If not, can you send
a tcpdump so that I can see which packets are getting through and which
aren't?
<ot>
This is what I see with conntrack loaded:
02:44:26.397954 eth1 P 132.229.232.30 > 132.229.231.240: icmp: echo request (frag
9878:1480@0+)
02:44:26.398192 eth1 P 132.229.232.30 > 132.229.231.240: (frag 9878:528@1480)
02:44:26.398236 eth0 > 132.229.232.30 > 132.229.231.240: icmp: echo request
Big packets are refragmented and sent out again as a whole packet, instead of
fragments, which breaks MTU. Am currently fixing.
</ot>
cheers,
Lennert
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge
