Hi,
Friday, September 07, 2001, 10:30:54 PM, you wrote:
LB> ..including full-fledged SNAT/DNAT, proper fragment handling, input/output
LB> device overloading (including logging), etc. Please give it a whirl and
LB> report problems.
LB> http://bridge.sf.net/devel/bridge-nf/20010907-2/
LB> The patch is functionally complete. This will be the '1.0' if no other bugs
LB> rear their ugly heads.
Linux version 2.4.9 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-81)) #1 Sun Sep 9 22:37:59 CEST 2001
XXX.XXX.32.4 --- [eth0|eth1] --- XXX.XXX.40.26
---------------------------------
150 byte ping as seen on bridge:
23:57:22.550863 eth0 P XXX.XXX.32.4 > XXX.XXX.40.26: icmp: echo request (DF) [tos 0x20]
23:57:22.550948 eth1 > XXX.XXX.32.4 > XXX.XXX.40.26: icmp: echo request (DF) [tos 0x20]
23:57:22.551221 eth1 P XXX.XXX.40.26 > XXX.XXX.32.4: icmp: echo reply [tos 0x20]
23:57:22.551291 eth0 > XXX.XXX.40.26 > XXX.XXX.32.4: icmp: echo reply [tos 0x20]
150 byte ping as seen on destination:
23:57:02.444669 eth0 < XXX.XXX.32.4 > XXX.XXX.40.26: icmp: echo request (DF) [tos 0x20]
23:57:02.444774 eth0 > XXX.XXX.40.26 > XXX.XXX.32.4: icmp: echo reply [tos 0x20]
---------------------------------
1500 byte ping as seen on bridge:
23:57:32.312239 eth0 P XXX.XXX.32.4 > XXX.XXX.40.26: (frag 58240:28@1480) (DF) [tos
0x20]
23:57:32.314294 eth0 P XXX.XXX.32.4 > XXX.XXX.40.26: icmp: echo request (frag
58240:1480@0+) (DF) [tos 0x20]
23:57:32.314524 eth1 > XXX.XXX.32.4 > XXX.XXX.40.26: icmp: echo request (frag
58240:1480@0+) [tos 0x20]
23:57:32.314549 eth1 > XXX.XXX.32.4 > XXX.XXX.40.26: (frag 58240:28@1480) [tos 0x20]
tcpdump shows that fragmented packet is being bridged but:
1500 byte ping as seen on destination:
23:57:12.209194 eth0 < XXX.XXX.32.4 > XXX.XXX.40.26: (frag 58240:28@1480) [tos 0x20]
oops, what's wrong ?
IPTables show no dropped packets.
--
Urtho
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge
