On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:25:39PM -0800, Dan Watson wrote:
> The packet capture problem does not appear to have been fixed by the
> bridge-nf-0.0.1-against-2.4.13-ac3.diff patch, applied against kernel
> 2.4.12. Although I can now see traffic both to and from the bridge
> interface's IP address, I still can't see the traffic that is being
> bridged.
Hmm.. same behaviour here on my test box. Not exactly sure what the
problem is. Will check this out tonight.
On second thought.. does this help?
--- br_passthrough.c.20010907-2.orig Tue Oct 30 01:23:02 2001
+++ br_passthrough.c.20010907-2 Tue Oct 30 01:23:18 2001
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@
return NF_ACCEPT;
dprintk(KERN_NOTICE "br_nf_local_in.. ");
- if (skb->pkt_type != PACKET_OTHERHOST) {
+ if (1 || skb->pkt_type != PACKET_OTHERHOST) {
dprintk("pass up\n");
if (skb->dst == &__fake_dst_entry) {
dst_release(&__fake_dst_entry);
> Another problem is that I get a kernel panic when I run "rmmod
> br_passthrough", whereas I usually get a "Device or resource busy" message
> when I try to remove any other kernel module which is in use.
This is probably module use counting messing up. Put this on my TODO
list as well.
thanks,
Lennert
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge
