On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 12:55:34PM -0600, Ben Neigebauer wrote:
> >Define 'enabled'. Just compiled, or also configured? With just the
> >diverter compiled in, there should be no problem, and there really should
> >be no reason to use the diverter if you are running the netfilter patch.
>
> My company has a driver/filter that tags certain port numbers/ip addresses
> based on a policy and sends a dataharvest back to the policy server.
Oh, cool. Where can I get it?
> Any clue as if this will still work?
Should be no problem.
> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
> is
> >> for the sole use of the intended recipient. The information contained
> within
> >> this message may be private and confidential, and may be subject to the
> work
> >> product doctrine. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or
> distribution
> >> is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
> >> sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
> >Blah.
>
> Yes unfortunately, my company adds this to all outgoing emails.
> There is no way of me blocking it without using a different email address.
> By emailing the list I am explicitly saying that all who can read the list
> (meaning the whole world) is authorized to view this email.
I don't really think the sender, let alone a relayer, of an email can
unilaterally impose such restrictions in the first place, but then again,
I'm not a lawyer.
cheers,
Lennert
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge
