On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 10:53:16PM -0500, Kunal Trivedi wrote:
> Hi Lennert,
Hi there,
> I've posted a msg. earlier for following configuration.
I think I remember.. however my memory is quite limited, and replying to
email usually happens in stateless mode :)
> bridge br0 ( 168.192.2.1)
> has eth1 and eth2
>
> and iptable rule
> iptables -A INPUT -i eth2 -j ACCEPT
>
> My assumption was, when bridge code puts pkt from eth1 to eth2, for eth2
> it is a incoming pkt. so i can apply INPUT chain. But, after traversing
> code, pkt goes from br_handle_frame -> NF_HOOKS -> dev_queue_xmit.
> Bottomline, it is a FORWARD path, not INPUT.
Hm, yes.
> Sorry for that. But, is there any way so any arp request from machines
> connected through eth1 for 168.192.2.1 ( or any IP) can be replied by br0.
> (Can br0 work as proxy arp ?).
'ebtables' sounds like it would do the job. Written by my partner-in-crime,
Bart De Schuymer. See here:
http://users.pandora.be/bart.de.schuymer/ebtables/example.html
If ebtables isn't (quite) capable of doing what you want, please let Bart
(and me) know.
cheers,
Lennert
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge
