Um... no...
If your default table policy is DROP then libipq ACCEPT does not equal -j ACCEPT... At least, that's not the way it used to be... -AEF On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 01:12, Rob McMillen wrote: > Ian, > > > No, if you issue ACCEPT it is just accepted, like the ACCEPT > > target. The ipq_set_verdict(3) man page might have given you > > impression that it continues traversal of the rules, but it simply > > continues traversal through the kernel. > > That makes perfect sense. Thanks. Don't know why I thought it would keep > going. I guess I just have to make sure I have all the firewall rules I > need in place before I sent the packet off to the QUEUE. > > > If there is no userspace listener then QUEUE will drop the traffic as > > described in libipq(3). > > Again, makes sense. Thanks. Anyone messed with libipq before? Would it > be too hard to implement the same type of functionality that you have with > iptables (i.e. REJECT, RETURN)? > > Rob > > > _______________________________________________ > Hogwash-iptables mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hogwash-iptables > _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge
