Hi!
I still haven't been able to reproduce it :( Do you still have the ability
to test some things? If so, can you try the following (incremental)
patches from http://bridge.sf.net/patchtracker-nf.html ?
00_brnf_post_routing_paranoia.diff
01_brnf_clean_up_protocol_checks.diff
They remove some potentially unsafe assumptions from the code. If these
patches fix it, could you determine which of the two actually did the
trick?
thanks,
Lennert
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:17:54PM +0300, Oleg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In fact, i found temporary decision for my problem (workaround :)). I've
> decided, the bridge can work without iptables patch, when i use the power
> of ebtables... (iptables patch is also useful, i'll miss it, so i think
> i'll queue bridges - one with iptables, next with ebtables:)). But
> please, don't forget this bug is still present...
>
> Thank you!
>
> Regards, Oleg.
>
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge
