----- Original Message ----- From: "Bart De Schuymer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Rene Bartsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 12:52 PM Subject: Re: [Bridge] Newbie having trouble to set up a bridge - please answer
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rene Bartsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 10:50 PM > Subject: [Bridge] Newbie having trouble to set up a bridge - please answer > > > > I do have the following network configuration (255.255.0.0 is netmask in > > the complete network): > > > > 10.1.x.x - clients > > | | | | | > > eth0 eth1 ------- | | | | | > > ------------ T-DSL------------ 100BaseTX | | | | | | | > > | Internet |------| Firewall |------------| HUB |----------------------- > > ------------ ------------ | | 10.1.0.0 | > > dynamicIP 10.1.1.1 ------- | > > | > > 10.1.2.1 | eth0 > > ----------- > > | Server | > > ----------- > > 10.2.2.1 | eth1 > > | > > 10.2.0.0 1000BaseT | > > -----------------------------------------------| > > | | | | | | | | | | | > > | | | | | | | | | | | > > | | | | | | | | | | | > > 10.2.x.x - clients > > It's working quite well, but the additionally 10.2.0.0 network increases > > administration (routing tables at the firewall, etc.) and causes trouble > > with windows clients and their workgroups. > > > ping 10.1.2.1 worked, but no connection to the to networks ... > > Is this a ping from a 10.1.x.x client? No, directly on the server ... > > > Did I do anythig wrong? > > I don't know. > If the problem is pinging from 10.1.x.x to 10.2.x.x maybe the problem is in > the routing table of the 10.1.x.x client. Maybe that routing table says > those packets have to be sent to the gateway (the firewall I presume). And > maybe the firewall's rules or routing table don't handle those packets well. I renamed the IP of a 10.2.x.x client to a completely new 10.1.x.x-IP (so there were no routing entries/tables). But no connection even from that client through the bridge to the other 10.1.x.x clients ... > > > Do I need any of the kernel patches (I only want it working for now, > > security and so on to be done later ...) > > No. > > > Might there be problems with the two (eth0 and eth1) 1000BaseT NICs > > (Allnet 0124, NS83820 supported by kernel module)? > > I dunno, guess not. > > cheers, > Bart > _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge
