On Wednesday 02 October 2002 17:44, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > Hello Bart, > The only thing that's been keeping me from offering 'official' > bridge-nf maintainership to you is that you (used to) sometimes > do send me incorrect patches, but as I said, with the code being > as complex as it is it's getting hard for me to really understand > what's going on, so my judgement is becoming less and less > relevant.
I'm in the process of writing a html-doc with the br-nf code and my explanations/assumptions. I'll post that when it's done, so you and DaveM and other more knowledgeable people than me can comment on it. I think such a thourough explanation is needed, for me too. > I have merged pretty much all of your stuff without really > looking at it (which means that all bugreports will go to you > now :), plus added some bugfixes of my own into bridge-nf 0.0.10, > not officially released yet. Could you have a peek at it to > see if it looks sane? (I just verified that it compiles.) > > http://bridge.sf.net/bridge-nf-0.0.10-against-2.4.19.diff Will have a look after food has entered my stomach :) World peace is a utopia btw, happiness on the other hand :) -- cheers, Bart _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge
