On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:04:01 +0200 Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 13:55:16 +0200, Michael Taubert wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:23:50 +0200 > > Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 13:17:03 +0200, Michael Taubert wrote: > > > > hi ! > > > > > > > > i guess you've discussed this topic much times, but i'm lost. > > > > it seems that the packets running through my bridging firewall, > > > > without traversing iptables at all. all rule counters are zero, > > > > the policy counters too. as i thought that maybe my rules does not > > > > match any packets, i expect the policy would at least, but it wont. > > > > i tried several connections myself, which should end in a drop, > > > > but it really seems that the packet is not traversing the forward table. > > > > currently i allready have one of such configuration running and have no > > > > further idea, of what is maybe misconfigured. > > > > > > > > the first this i tried was a: > > > > > > > > -A FORWARD -j LOG > > > > > > > > but nothing is logged. the counter is still zero. > > > > > > > > any idea ? > > > > > > Yes, read http://bridge.sourceforge.net/ > > > > wow, what a great advice. from where, do you guess, i've subscribed > > to this list ?! :) if i had found the information, i wouln't post > > anything here. so i need help and not that damn RTFM stuff. please, > > be so kind and give me a real hint. i can read it again and again and > > i still don't get it. > > "patches for doing firewalling in combination with bridging (both > ipchains and iptables)." > > It won't work without the patches. > now that you say patches, i realize that i used a patch on my other running configuration. i totally forget about that. thank you. :) bye, michael _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge
