[Bridge] RE: [patch] A more general way to hook into the rx path.

[Eble, Dan]

David S. Miller wrote:
>
> People can implement proprietary TCP stacks using this "nifty
> hook" you've created.  So I can't accept these changes.

Can't they do that already?  For example,

    static int __init carnivore_init()
    {
            ...
            old_br_hook          = br_handle_frame_hook;
            br_handle_frame_hook = my_1337_proprietary_rx;
            ...
    }

-- 
Dan Eble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  _____  .
                           |  _  |/|
Applied Innovation Inc.    | |_| | |
http://www.aiinet.com/     |__/|_|_|

_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge