Hi
iup i tried that already
the top of my init script looks like this
/usr/sbin/hdparm -c 1 -d 1 /dev/hda
/usr/local/sbin/brctl addbr br0
/usr/local/sbin/brctl stp br0 off
echo '65535' > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/proxy_arp
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
now the "proxy_arp" line is new i saw it in one example
unfortunatly i can't benchmark it right now. i will do it as soon as possible
because i don't now if it makes any diference, i am just guessing.
i am adding the contens of my /proc/sys/net/ipv4 , so if anyone sees anything
that should be different let me know:
all/accept_redirects:0
all/accept_source_route:0
all/arp_filter:0
all/bootp_relay:0
all/forwarding:1
all/log_martians:0
all/mc_forwarding:0
all/medium_id:0
all/proxy_arp:1
all/rp_filter:0
all/secure_redirects:1
all/send_redirects:1
all/shared_media:1
all/tag:0
br0/accept_redirects:1
br0/accept_source_route:1
br0/arp_filter:0
br0/bootp_relay:0
br0/forwarding:1
br0/log_martians:0
br0/mc_forwarding:0
br0/medium_id:0
br0/proxy_arp:0
br0/rp_filter:0
br0/secure_redirects:1
br0/send_redirects:1
br0/shared_media:1
br0/tag:0
default/accept_redirects:1
default/accept_source_route:1
default/arp_filter:0
default/bootp_relay:0
default/forwarding:1
default/log_martians:0
default/mc_forwarding:0
default/medium_id:0
default/proxy_arp:0
default/rp_filter:0
default/secure_redirects:1
default/send_redirects:1
default/shared_media:1
default/tag:0
eth0/accept_redirects:1
eth0/accept_source_route:1
eth0/arp_filter:0
eth0/bootp_relay:0
eth0/forwarding:1
eth0/log_martians:0
eth0/mc_forwarding:0
eth0/medium_id:0
eth0/proxy_arp:0
eth0/rp_filter:0
eth0/secure_redirects:1
eth0/send_redirects:1
eth0/shared_media:1
eth0/tag:0
eth1/accept_redirects:1
eth1/accept_source_route:1
eth1/arp_filter:0
eth1/bootp_relay:0
eth1/forwarding:1
eth1/log_martians:0
eth1/mc_forwarding:0
eth1/medium_id:0
eth1/proxy_arp:0
eth1/rp_filter:0
eth1/secure_redirects:1
eth1/send_redirects:1
eth1/shared_media:1
eth1/tag:0
eth2/accept_redirects:1
eth2/accept_source_route:1
eth2/arp_filter:0
eth2/bootp_relay:0
eth2/forwarding:1
eth2/log_martians:0
eth2/mc_forwarding:0
eth2/medium_id:0
eth2/proxy_arp:0
eth2/rp_filter:0
eth2/secure_redirects:1
eth2/send_redirects:1
eth2/shared_media:1
eth2/tag:0
lo/accept_redirects:1
lo/accept_source_route:1
lo/arp_filter:0
lo/bootp_relay:0
lo/forwarding:1
lo/log_martians:0
lo/mc_forwarding:0
lo/medium_id:0
lo/proxy_arp:0
lo/rp_filter:0
lo/secure_redirects:1
lo/send_redirects:1
lo/shared_media:1
lo/tag:0
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 16:48, Nick Fedchik wrote:
> Hello Joao Carvalho,
> Tuesday, April 1, 2003, 11:05:02, you wrote:
> JC> the ram shouldn't be a problem either :
> JC> total used free shared buffers
> cached JC> Mem: 222760 67208 155552 0 19464
> 14332
>
> >> JC> This network has a lot of clients, when i did an line count in
> >> JC> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max
> >> JC> i got more than 23000 conections.
>
> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max ?
> 32752 ?
>
> You may try to increase amount of conntrack records by
> echo '65000' > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max
>
> >> How much the RAM on your box?
>
> I think 256Mb is enough for 65000 conntracks.
>
> >> JC> It is an AMD Athlon XP 2000+.
> >> JC> the motherboard is an top EPOX, and the ethernet cards are
> >> intelpro100.
>
> This looks powerful.
--
Cumprimentos
Joao Carvalho
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge
