On Thursday 05 June 2003 10:49, giangy wrote: > > Do you have a routing table entry for net 10.30.3.x? > > This doesn't look like a bug to me. > > What do the rule counters say? > > What about tcpdump? > > > > Bart > > IT WORKS!!! > > adding routing table entries for remote nets now redirect works! > > Since I could reach remote hosts WITHOUT routing entries... > why does the kernel need it???
This is just a guess, since I haven't tried it, but here it goes... In your configuration without a direct route to 10.30.3.x: When you ping from the bridge, the packet is sent to your default gateway and then to the host. When the 10.30.3.x host sends a packet that is redirected on the bridge, the bridge wants to reply directly to the 10.30.3.x host and doesn't have a direct route, so the bridge drops the packet. cheers, Bart _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge
