>Gosh, for you guys wanting soooooo badly to *not* discuss this >topic, you still managed to generate 10 replies to my message. >And not one of you decided to contact me off-list, which is what I >would do if I really wanted to avoid creating public discussion. >Now, of course, you're generating four more from me. Go figure. A coincidence of timing, John. And the responses were hardly what anyone would consider a call to continue the discussion. Your implied conclusion that anyone who responded wanted any further discourse is a flawed one at best. >I mean, what was it? Was it just too tempting to lay in a lick at >me in public, rather than accomplishing your goal? Don't be a martyr. Your statement is tantamount to telling the recess teacher "Everyone's picking on me." If I wanted to "lay in a lick" at you, I'd have hardly responded in the manner that I did. I don't believe that anything in my post was remotely disparaging, especially not in relation to your "mice to cheese" comment that implies the folks who responded to your post lack the will to ignore you; hardly flattering, wouldn't you say? Jim _______________________________________________________ Say Bye to Slow Internet! http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html
