In a message dated 11/10/00 2:03:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< All that being said, don't like the idea of a re-vote.  With the 
perspective
the re-voters now have it would be quite unfair.  But I don't know what should
be done.  >>


Before I say anything else, let me state for the record that I'm a lifelong 
Democrat and a strong supporter of Al Gore. I think George Bush is a 
disgraceful moron and will be a disastrous embarrassment as President.

That said, however, I think there have to be limits to how far one can 
challenge this election - both as to results and to how it was conducted - 
without so poisoning the atmosphere that the race becomes one not worth 
winning. Al Gore can, if he wants, continue the challenge in court and maybe 
even get some or all of the result in Florida overturned. He CAN - but SHOULD 
he?

I'm not so sure, and I'm someone who desperately wants him to win. But 
challenging the result in Florida would open up similar challenges in every 
single state where the result was close (even though it wasn't this close in 
any other state). I'm not sure that's in the long-term best interest of the 
country.

I realize I'm not Al Gore and I did not spend the past two years striving 
might and main to become President. It's almost impossible for him to give up 
on his dream when he's so close. None of us can imagine what he's feeling 
right now. Still, I think at some point he has to be a statesman and accept 
that he has lost.

That point is not now. He has every right to demand a hand count of every 
vote. He has every right to insist that they wait for the absentee ballots to 
be counted. But if and when both those things occur, and if at that point he 
has still not won Florida, he needs to concede that Bush won.

At that point, what I personally think Gore should do is lead a nationwide 
commission to make sure that this kind of nonsense NEVER OCCURS AGAIN. 
Florida is not the only state with ambiguous ballots, missing ballot boxes, 
spoiled ballots, poorly trained election workers, etc. We are the richest, 
most technically sophisticated nation that ever existed - and we can't 
conduct a transparently fair election? I think we need minimum national 
standards (say THAT, Dubya!) at least on presidential elections. That we are 
still using paper ballots in many places in this day and age is absurd. I 
think Gore should lead an effort to come up with a better way to stage 
elections. He could couple that with an effort to pass some serious campaign 
finance reform, and to increase registration and voter turnout. That would be 
performing a true service to the nation. It would also give him something to 
do.

As for George W....he has two alternatives. He can realize how thin his 
margin of victory was and truly try to govern as a bi-partisan President. Or, 
he can decide that half the country is going to disapprove of him no matter 
what he does and try to govern as if he'd won with 60%. Just go ahead and do 
what he really wants to do. If it works, he'll be reelected in 2004. If not, 
well, at least he went down trying.

Problem with that is, it's what Bill Clinton tried to do in 1993-94, and look 
what happened to him in the '94 mid-term elections. So he's probably better 
off, at least in the short term, in trying as hard as he can to satisfy the 
entire country.

I'm not Gore or Bush (nor have I ever played either one on TV), but that's 
what I would do if I were these two men.

I stress that this is what I think should happen AFTER the ENTIRE process in 
Florida is absolutely over. Which won't be until next Tuesday at the earliest.

Let me also stress that this is my advice to the two campaigns. What citizens 
in Florida, particularly in Palm Beach County, do is up to them. I'd hope the 
campaigns would stay out of it, but I do know that's extremely unlikely to 
happen.

Finally, the Bush campaign is being disingenuous when it accuses the Gore 
campaign of politicizing the situation in Florida. Choosing a president is an 
inherently political process. It has been politicized all along - and it 
should be. If the situation were reversed, the Bush people would be doing 
exactly what the Gore people are doing. It's easy for Bush to say NOW that he 
would concede. But there's no way he'd just give up until he'd explored every 
imaginable option.

Let's be patient, everyone. We still don't know how this is going to end.



Tom Beck

Reply via email to