Julia said:
SNIP
> Another reading method that probably works better for non-fiction is to
> skim the book, then go back and read the chapters that looked to be of
> most interest.
I confess I sometimes do the same for non-fiction.
SNIP
> I'm sorry if this tangent was not at all the sort of thing you had in mind
> when you made your post, but it gave me the opening to put down in words
> some stuff that had been bouncing around in my head for awhile.
No apologies necessary.
**writes Julia's name in schedule of comrades requiring re-education**
(Just kidding). (:>)
It doesn't realy matter if anyone agrees or hacks my post to pieces. In the
same vein, I am grateful to Daryl for expressing his questions and thoughts
the way he did, because I spent most of the day's spare time thinking about
it. Sometimes I find politics and international events depressing because of
the suffering, but thinking about it from the point of view of the Orwellian
propaganda is sort of another step removed from that.
> p.s. the possessive of "it" is "its" -- no apostrophe.
Thanks for pointing that out.
> Other than that,
> your post looked very well-written to me.
Punctuation or content? (>:)
Bob.
