[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > My plan for our as-yet hypothetical child(ren) is to answer "why?" with >an > > excrutiatingly exacting answer (and a trip to the library or web if > > necessary). When I do that to Susan she usually bops me on the head. > >Worked for my parents..... "look it up" was a mantra at our house. >My parents even spent several hundreds of dollars on >encyclopedias for home to keep up with their statement as we >got older :-) The only acceptable alternative is the "Calvin's Dad" approach. Answer straight-faced with the most outrageous and insinuous deception that comes to mind. On that note, if you're feeling cynical, remember to read Boxjam's Doodle(http://boxjam.keenspace.com/) daily. It's a hoot. Joshua _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Ronn Blankenship
- Objectionable material for children Darryl Shannon
- Re: Objectionable material for children John D. Giorgis
- Re: Objectionable material for children Julia Thompson
- RE: Objectionable Material for Children Jean-Louis Couturier
- RE: Objectionable Material for Children Julia Thompson
- RE: Objectionable Material for Children Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Kanandarqu
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Kanandarqu
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Julia Thompson
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Joshua Bell
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Bemmzim
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Julia Thompson
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children dendriite
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Bemmzim
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Kanandarqu
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Julia Thompson
