Kristin wrote:
> I have doubts about "non lethal." Everything touted as "non lethal" hws
> wound up being blamed (justifiably or not) for killing somebody. Taser
> guns, choke holds (cops and PCP user typically), you name it. Can you
> really be sure that out of zillions of people some one wouldn't be
> hypersensitive and get a fatal overdose of stun rays, or whatever?
well, the reality is that even if the weapon was guaranteed 100% non-lethal,
there is still risk. For example, a police officer stuns a suspect. The
suspect falls and hits his head on a rock, or falls into the path of a car.
There will always be some sort of risk, but as Joshua said, this method is
less likely to be lethal.
Gary
winmail.dat
