Jeroen van Baardwijk wrote: > > Of course I'm serious. After all, you claim that the > radiation risk from me is greater than the radiation > risk from nuclear power. > That's not what he claimed. He claimed that the radiation *output* from you was greater than the radiation *output* from a nuclear power plant. > If the radiation risk from nuclear power is so much less, > then why are the safety measures so extremely more strict? > Logic dictates that higher risk requires more > safety measures, not less. > The inverse is true: since the safety measures are extremely strict, then the output radiation is very small Alberto Monteiro - but I am *very* biased these days...
- Re: Brin-L baby boom! Steve Sloan
- Re: Brin-L baby boom! Jean-Marc Chaton
- Re: Brin-L baby boom! evenstar
- Re: Brin-L baby boom! Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: Brin-L baby boom! Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: W. on the Environment Bemmzim
- Re: W. on the Environment Ronn Blankenship
- Re: W. on the Environment Bemmzim
- Re: W. on the Environment Ronn Blankenship
- Re: W. on the Environment Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- W. On the Environment Alberto Monteiro
- W. On the Environment Darryl Shannon
- Re: W. on the Environment Bemmzim
- Re: W. on the Environment Bemmzim
- Re: W. on the Environment Bemmzim
- Re: W. on the Environment Alberto Monteiro
- Re: W. on the Environment Alberto Monteiro
- Re: W. on the Environment Dan Minette
- Re: W. on the Environment Bemmzim
