At 09:56 PM 5/21/01 +0200 J. van Baardwijk wrote:
>Of course I'm serious. After all, you claim that the radiation risk from me
>is greater than the radiation risk from nuclear power. If the radiation
>risk from nuclear power is so much less, then why are the safety measures
>so extremely more strict? Logic dictates that higher risk requires more
>safety measures, not less.
Jeroen, I think that Dan's point is that *because* of the strict safety
regulations in place at nuclear plants, there is now greater exposure to a
given individual from another individual, than from a nuclear plant.
JDG
__________________________________________________________
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ICQ #3527685
"The point of living in a Republic after all, is that we do not live by
majority rule. We live by laws and a variety of institutions designed
to check each other." -Andrew Sullivan 01/29/01
- Re: W. on the Environment Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: W. on the Environment Ronn Blankenship
- Re: W. on the Environment Dan Minette
- Re: W. on the Environment Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: W. on the Environment Julia Thompson
- Re: W. on the Environment Ronn Blankenship
- Re: W. on the Environment J. van Baardwijk
- RE: W. on the Environment Charlie Bell
- Re: W. on the Environment Dan Minette
- Re: W. on the Environment J. van Baardwijk
- RE: W. on the Environment John D. Giorgis
- RE: W. on the Environment Charlie Bell
- Re: W. on the Environment Doug Pensinger
- Re: W. on the Environment Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: W. on the Environment Dan Minette
- Nuclear Power Re: W. on the Environment John D. Giorgis
- Re: W. on the Environment Dan Minette
- Re: W. on the Environment Ronn Blankenship
- Re: W. on the Environment Dan Minette
- Re: W. on the Environment Doug Pensinger
- RE: W. on the Environment Charlie Bell
