On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Ronn Blankenship wrote:
> At 06:00 PM 6/17/01, Julia wrote:
>
> >They exempted a class of items from the sales tax in the legislative
> >session a couple of years ago -- basically, stuff to prevent disease and
> >stuff to treat disease. There was supposed to be some sort of addendum to
> >the bill that didn't get added that would have made condoms still taxable,
> >but since it didn't make it in, you don't have to pay the sales tax on
> >condoms, which gave a number of people fits on the grounds that it would
> >encourage promiscuity. Of course, the only times I've been using condoms
> >have been for having sex with my husband,
>
>
> From posts made to this list over the past several months, you obviously
> have not been consistent in their use.
>
> (Admit it. You expected this reply.)
Well, if I'd had enough brain to have been thinking, I would have! :)
We were using them for a period of time during which we didn't want me to
be pregnant, followed by a period of deliberately not using them so that I
might get pregnant.
And now there's this little boy in the other room who's using me as a food
source and who would much rather be held than put down to bed.
Julia
