At 04:58 PM 7/3/01, Alberto Monteiro wrote: >Darryl Shannon wrote: > > > > Alberto, help me out here! > > >I feel very tempted to just say "Amen". But I will just find >one nit to pick: > > >Orbits are always > >parabolic, hyperbolic, or elliptical (with circular being an elliptical > >orbit with zero eccentricity). > > >This is valid for the two-body problem [two bodies orbiting each >other, only subject to their mutual gravity]; in the real case, however, >there are other forces [non-gravitational, oblateness, other bodies] >that make the "classical" two-body orbit an approximation. I thought a "two-body problem" was the cleanup task facing a double murderer . . . -- Ronn! :)
- Earth on Edge Darryl Shannon
- Re: Earth on Edge Matt Grimaldi
- Re: Earth on Edge Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Earth on Edge Andrew Crystall
- RE: Earth on Edge Chad Cooper
- Space on Edge Dean Forster
- RE: Earth on Edge J. van Baardwijk
- RE: Earth on Edge Ronn Blankenship
- RE: Earth on Edge Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Earth on Edge Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Earth on Edge Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Earth on Edge Julia Thompson
- Re: Earth on Edge Alberto Monteiro
- Earth on Edge Darryl Shannon
- Re: Earth on Edge J. van Baardwijk
- Re: Earth on Edge Dan Minette
- When statistics hit the individual... Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: Earth on Edge Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Earth on Edge J. van Baardwijk
- Re: Earth on Edge Dan Minette
- Re: Earth on Edge J. van Baardwijk
