>At 09:23 AM 7/19/01, you wrote:
>
>> > >
>>> >If you are talking about muon catalyst, then it is theoretically
>>possible,
>>> >but devilishly tricky.
>>> >
>>> >Dan M.
>>>
>>>
>>> Except that no one has figured out how get more energy from the fusion
>>> reactions that muon can catalyze during its lifetime of a couple of
>>hundred
>>> nanoseconds or so than it takes to create the muon in the first place . .
>>.
>>>
>>
>>Right. On paper it can be done. The other can't even be done on paper.
>>I'm not holding my breath for it, I rate it as a low probability, but still
>>orders of magnitude above cold fusion in a jar.
>>
>>Dan M.
>
>
>BTW, I went to grad school in the physics dep't at BYU back in the
>early-mid 80s and was still living in Provo in the spring of 1989,
>so I was somewhat of a firsthand witness to the spectacle (or
>debacle) of "cold fusion" . . .
>
>
>-- Ronn! :)
Can you tell us anything interesting?....
Brad DeLong
