In a message dated 7/20/01 11:11:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< 
 Well let's say there's cooperation AND competition in nature. However, the
 United States seems to empahsize the competitive side (Social Darwinism
 was real popular here...) at the expense of the cooperative side, while
 other cultures do not over-value individualism and therefore can cooperate
 better. *That* gets us back to politics. (Oh, can somebody give this
 thread a title? I haven't figured out how to edit the header in this
 particular program.)
  >>
I actually think the cooperation competition/ paradign is wrong for nature or 
at least misleading. Natural things act selfishly period. This is better seen 
as zero sum (roughly but not exactly competitive) and non-zero (roughly but 
not exactly cooperative). As to what we in america do: I'm not sure that our 
individualism really translates into competitive versus cooperative. All 
complex societies (and ours is amoung the most complex) are cooperative.  
Individualism to me is more about personal actions than economic actions. 

Reply via email to