Kristin wrote:
> Thank you thank you THANK YOU andy for putting in words what i was
> concerned about. Yeah, this guy's sources are heavily biased by big
> business and big money. So what if his earlier view was slanted one
> way. It's now extremely slanted the other way and in a more evil and
> insidious manner because the backing of these groups is more business than
> science. Some of his "sources" are the groups being protested at WTO trade
> meetings. The whore.
I'm reminded of the anecdote about the guy that propositions a woman:
M: Will you sleep with me for a million dollars?
W: Why, yes!
M: How about twenty?
W: Of course not! What kind of woman do you think I am?
M: I thought we'd established that, and were simply negotiating the price.
Adam Lipscomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
