On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 04:23:03PM +1000, Brett Coster wrote:
> 1. A lot of these books I've not read for decades. Some of my judgements
> will be based on what I can remember feeling about a book. I know in a lot
> of cases I would think differently if I was to read the book now. (For
> example, at 14 I loved Alistair MacLean books. Nowadays I can't get passed
> the first few pages of any but a couple.) Is this taken as a given? Any
> ideas how we can identify the bias here? It will probably skew a lot in
> favour of Asimov/Clarke/Heinlein.
I'd be inclined to rate the books based on what you would think about
them if you had read them last week. If this is too difficult, just
do what you think is best.
> 2. Please add "Ash" by Mary Gentle. The version I read was a single volume,
> but the book has been published as a trilogy also. I imagine there'll be
> other books published that way, too.
>
> 3. Please add the following books by George Turner:
> Beloved Son
> Vaneglory
> Yesterday's Men
I'll get them added by the end of this week.
> Will try to get this to you by end of month. Might cheat with the Date Line
> though! ;-)
Since everyone has been a bit pre-occupied, let's extend the deadline a
little bit, let's say, Oct. 15.
--
"Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://erikreuter.com/
