On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Nick Arnett wrote: > Jesus, Buddha, Mother Theresa, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King, Oscar > Romero... there is a long list of virtuous people who did not receive > material wealth as a consequence. Arguing that virtuous behavior produces > material wealth and power is ridiculous, to be blunt. Some virtuous people > have been wealthy; many materially impoverished people have been virtuous. > The only cause and effect between material wealth and virtue taught by the > collected wisdom of the ages is that wealth can become an obstacle to > virtue. It is very easy, many religions warn us, to fall in love with > things and as a result, fail to love one's neighbors and God.
I thought that Gautam's point was the virtuous government -- that is, government that promotes liberty, equality, free speech, and so on -- is one of the direct causes of a wealthy society because it enables people to live up to their full potential. NOT that virtuous individuals are more likely to be wealthy than unvirtuous individuals. In other words, Nick, governments that endorse the liberal humanist values that you and I espouse are more likely to govern wealthy societies than governments that enforce tyrranical, straitened interpretations of one religious dogma or another. It's an entirely different issue from the question of whether a rich man can expect to enter the kingdom of heaven. Marvin Long Austin, Texas "If you will not grant me victory, then grant me vengeance!" Conan the Barbarian "Blessed are the peacemakers." Jesus Christ
