Of course, you would want to use a native haemoragic virus instead of Ebola, Pampa, or Korean haemoragic fevers. If you use an appropriate endemic virus it will take the CDC longer to determine that it has an intentional technological vector and did not occur naturally.
The sort endemic in Northern Arizona and the four corners region can be aerosoled and the f[0] generation is usually caught by a human through contact with rodent urine or feces that are aerosoled during cleaning, or more rarely through direct contact with an infected animal. I don't know how easy it is to transmit from human to human. However, most of the haemoragic viruses are quite contageous. Contact with bodily fluids or with the body of an infected or deceased victim are particularly dangerous. On Friday 12 October 2001 18:14, you wrote: > Trent Shipley wrote: > > Anthrax is probably too conservative. > > > > Were I them I would opt for one of the agressive > > hemoragic fevers. > > On "Babylon 5," Delenn made Sheridan take a short vacation > when he started thinking too much like the enemy... > ______________________________________________________________________ > Steve Sloan ......... Huntsville, Alabama =========> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Startide: Steve Sloan's Pages ================> http://www.sloan3d.com > Brin-L list pages ........................... Chmeee's POV-Ray Objects > 3D and Drawing Galleries ....................... Science fiction scans > Science Fiction, Science, and Computer Links ................ Software
