However, I had read a number of overwhelming reviews, and my
expectations were  sky-high.  I was somewhat distracted by the fact
that I knew the story backwards and forwards.  I _really_ admired the
book because I have a feel for the 30 years of work developing the
legends that support the story and how it is the definitive piece of
work in this area.  Since I am a sped redder, I tend to re-read the
LOTR every year or two, so I know it fairly well.  So, there were no
surprises at all, which made it harder to appreciate the plot and the
character development. Indeed, during most of the movie, I was
comparing my vision with the directors.  I think his was good, but
the differences were distracting at time.

Having said that, I still think it was a great movie.  I will
probably go see it again after Christmas, when the crouds are lower.

I read the book a long time ago and didn't really like it, wasn't into
fantasy then. Now I am re-reading it; I'm just past weathertop. So
everything up to that is very fresh. That said: I liked the points that
were different. The chases were unexpected and got my heart racing.

At the rate I'm going I'll finish the first book by May...when the dvd
comes out I can match what I've read and what I see. But on culture
someone said that Tolkein (sp?) left gaping plot holes which were filled
in at the end of this movie. Of course some parts were given short cover
or no explination, but that didn't bother me at all.

Visually the movie is stuning. I didn't like Gladiator, but the movie
was so FULL. This one is the same way...except that it is a little dark.

Kevin T.

Reply via email to