> From: Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Brin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:53 AM
> > Subject: Re: Bible translations Re: Tragedy in Israel
> > > > Well, your opinion is not shared by mainstream scripture
scholars.  My
> > > > daughter has it in her collection of inter-testament literature
which
> > > she
> > > > studied as part of her theology degree at a Presbyterian school. 
I
> > > studied
> > > > it as part of my course in Persian and Hellenistic Judaism. 
IIRC, the
> > > > general consensus is that it was written around 150 BCE...but I
> haven't
> > > dug
> > > > my notes out on this.
> > >
> > > When exactly was the Julian calendar implemented?  Specifically the
> > > Lengths of the months (which are contained within the book of
Enoch)?
> >
> > Where is it contained?  Could you please quote chapter and verse on
that?
> 
> Never mind, I found it. :-)
> 
> 
> The Book of the Heavenly Luminaries comprises chapters 72-82.  In it,
there
> are many references to the period of the moon with respect to the year.
 One
> quote that stands out early is:
> 
> Enoch 74:16-17
> [For in 8 years she falls behind to the amount of 80 days], all the 17
days
> she falls behind in 8 years are 80. And the year is accurately
completed in
> conformity with their world-stations and the stations of the sun, which
rise
> from the portals through which it (the sun) rises and sets 30 days
> 
> Later, months are discussed in some detail in chapter 78.  Quoting vs.
13-16
> (I think)
> 
> On the side whence the light of the moon comes forth, there again she
wanes
> till all the light vanishes and all the days of the month are at an
end, and
> her circumference is empty, void of 5 light. And three months she makes
of
> thirty days, and at her time she makes three months of twenty- nine
days
> each, in which she accomplishes her waning in the first period of time,
and
> in the first 6 portal for one hundred and seventy-seven days. And in
the
> time of her going out she appears for three months (of) thirty days
each,
> and for three months she appears (of) twenty-nine each. At night she
appears
> like a man for twenty days each time, and by day she appears like the
> heaven, and there is nothing else in her save her light.
> 
> This gives a year of 364 days, one less than the Julian calander, IIRC.
> Indeed, 264 days is mentioned earlier in Enoch 34: 12-13:
> 
> And the sun and the stars bring in all the years exactly, so that they
do
> not advance or delay their position by a single day unto eternity; but
> complete the years with perfect justice in 364 days.
> 
> So, I think the arguement about the Julian calendar doesn't hold water.
> Where is the reference to 365.25 days/year?  (Indeed I did a search on
Enoch
> and had two hits for 364 and zero for 365).  All one has to presume is
some
> familiarity with the Babylonian calender, which they obviously had.
> 
> Isn't it a wonder what's available on the net?

http://www.light1998.com/ENOCH/6e.JPG

from

http://www.light1998.com/ENOCH/ENOCH.htm

Reply via email to