At 06:41 28-1-02 -0800, Nick Arnett wrote: > > Given that you replied to my statement that I could not find the country, > > the only logical conclusion is that you were saying that the country of > > Palestine *does* exist. > >Now this is just getting silly. Surely you can argue more cogently than >claiming he said something he obviously didn't mean.
Let's see. I say "the country of Palestine does not exist". John replies "the League of Arab Nations has the state of Palestine as a member". Since he uses that reply to counter my argument (IOW: prove that the country of Palestine *does* exist), why should I assume he does not mean what he is writing? When he wrote "your ridiculous knows no bounds", "your moral relativism is sickening", called me anti-Semitic and a Nazi, you think he did not mean that either? Jeroen _________________________________________________________________________ Wonderful World of Brin-L Website: http://www.Brin-L.com Tom's Photo Gallery: http://tom.vanbaardwijk.com
