[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I could point out that Krugman has become such a loon that he has written > in the New York Times his belief that Enron is more important than > September 11th.
I truly find that hard to believe - 9/11 is obviously changing not just international policy and outlook but internal politics as well. > Or comment on what a tragedy it is that one of the best > economic minds of his generation has turned into the worst New York Times > columnist in living memory. But I think the best thing to do is to paste > Andrew Sullivan's response to Krugman's rant, from his superb website > www.andrewsullivan.com. Below: Thank Gautam. While I find myself in agreement with Sullivan about the correctness of the Enron == Bush Budget equation, I have to say that he (Sullivan) has done nothing to refute the essential points that Krugman manages to get out before his rant derails - how are 70 ton artillery pieces, missle defense, and a tax cut for rich contributors going to help in the "War on Terror"? -j- -- moo.
