Darryl Shannon wrote:
> 
> And I do NOT follow Alberto around!  That is a baseless
> accusation that my enemies have manufactured the
> evidence for.
> 
I thought that the data meant that I was following _you_.

> And...did the chlorine discussion just up and DIE?  Come
> on.  Chlorine! Chlorine, people!  Let's get something
> going there for crying out loud.
>
It�s off-topic.

BTW, ever since I learned the Periodic Table I have been
curious about "replacements", for example, why there
is methane but not the Si-equivalent or why there
are many N-O combinations but very few P-O combinations.

Also, I heard about chemical components that used
noble gases, something like Kr F_n

Or to enter the realm of arcane science: IIRC, some
people were studying the _chemical_ properties of
"hidrogen atoms" were either the proton or the electron
were replaced by other particles. These "atoms"
are, obviously, unstable, but during their short existence
they could form chemical components.

Alberto Monteiro

Reply via email to