----- Original Message -----
From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: What John Said


> <10cf01c1af6c$b763bbe0$6401a8c0@dendrite>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Robert Seeberger wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Brin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:45 PM
> > Subject: Re: What John Said
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:25:57PM -0800, Matt Grimaldi wrote:
> > >
> > > > If I have to read another post like this, Erik, you'll be the first
> > > > I've had to filter into the trash based on sending address.
> > >
> > > Has to read posts he doesn't like and then has to trash filter
> > > Erik. Pooooor Matt. Aaaaaahhhhhh.
> > >
> > Does this work with chicks?
> >
> > <G>
>
> Generally not, for the simple reason that young barnyard fowl tend not
> to read very much e-mail.
>
Then there is the hunt'n'peck typing method prefered by unwashed roosters
like me.
<G>

xponent
Cock-a-doodle-doo Maru
rob

Reply via email to