>I've got _Good Omens_ and _Stardust_ sitting on my shelf but haven't
>gotten around to them yet. I will soon. I'll keep those others in
>mind.
>
>I guess it makes sense that Gaiman would do better on short stories
>considering how amazing he was during his run on _Sandman_.

No argument from me there. Stardust is good, but Good Omens is better. I am sure there are a few Pratchett fans on the list; I'd recommend it to any of them, too. It's very funny, in that dry British way.

Jim


Reply via email to