>A nifty little game that checks to see how internally consistent your >religious beliefs are. >http://www.philosophers.co.uk/games/god.htm > >From the site: >In this activity you'll be asked a series of 17 questions about God >and >religion. In each case, apart from Question 1, you need to answer >True or False. The aim of the activity is not to judge whether these >answers are correct or not. Our battleground is that of rational >consistency.
Here's the Message I got: "Battleground Analysis: Congratulations! You have been awarded the TPM medal of honour! This is our highest award for outstanding service on the intellectual battleground. The fact that you progressed through this activity neither being hit nor biting a bullet suggests that your beliefs about God are internally consistent and very well thought out. A direct hit would have occurred had you answered in a way that implied a logical contradiction. You would have bitten bullets had you responded in ways that required that you held views that most people would have found strange, incredible or unpalatable. However, you avoided both these fates - and in doing so qualify for our highest award. A fine achievement!" Damn Straight! Yep, being an atheist because you find no evidence that convinces you that an entity that could be called God exists is a pretty easy way to achieve logical consistency. ===== Darryl Think Galactically -- Act Terrestrially __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com
