But isn't that the point of building settlements? To try to make it
impossible for any future Israeli government to avoid annexing large
chunks of the West Bank?

Brad DeLong

Me:
Do you have evidence for that?  I mean, do you have actual declarations by
Sharon or something equivalent that this is the case, or are you just
attributing malign motives to him?  Sharon is committed to the settlements
because they're popular in Israel.  They're popular in Israel because Israel
is a itty-bitty little country that is 8 miles across at the waist, and the
settlements can give them more space to live.  The far right in Israel does
want to annex the West Bank, yes, but Sharon is not a member of the Israeli
far right.  Sharon is the head of the Likud Party, one of the two largest
parties in Israel.  He's not even the most right wing major member of the
Likud - Bibi Netanyahu is on _his_ right, and Bibi is, in my opinion, the
best person for the job of PM in Israel right now.  N.B. that during
Netanyahu's term in office, _not one_ Israeli citizen was killed by
terrorist action.  It's not a coincidence.  One of the handicaps of being a
democracy - particularly one with a Parliamentary system as screwed up as
Israel's - is that it is hard to create coherent policies.  Governmental
actions tend to become the product of logrolling - I support your policy so
you support mine.  One of the logs that got rolled was the settlement
policy.  So far as I know Sharon supports the settlements at the moment
because he believes - correctly, imo - that if he retreats from the
settlements the Palestinian terrorists will perceive it as a victory.  He
believes - again, correctly, imo - that these terrorists are not appeasable.
They want to destroy Israel, and any sign of Israeli weakness only
strengthens their hand.  Notice that his intervention in the West Bank has
been a stunning success.  He has shattered the terrorist infrastructure of
the West Bank, found conclusive proof that Yaser Arafat was directly
responsible for the terrorist attacks on Israel, and virtually ended
terrorist attacks within Israel proper.  A win on all counts.  He seems to
have finally found a policy that works.  The Europeans may not support him -
but the Europeans have never shown any signs of caring if Israelis get blown
up, either, so why should he care?

Gautam

Reply via email to