> Let me check yesterda's newspaper O:-)
> 
> ** Front Page: 
> 
> 1 news about Vatican [br saint - the first one - canonized]
> 
> 3 local news [one of them cites a _false_ statistics -- they said that
> three babies died of hospitalar infection on Thursday in certain
> Hospital, and, by coincidence, my wife _was_ there, and she
> knew that, that day, one baby died because he was born
> with 590 grams and he was in bad condition, and another one
> died in the ICU [she doesn't know the reason]]

With 590 grams? Do you mean that was his birth weight? (Honest, don't know)

> 1 news about the "team" that will "play" in the World Cup
> 
> 1 news about Israel
> 
> 1 news about Cannes [France]
> 
> 1 news about blogs, mentioning the USA.

Blogs? This is second time I've seen this word. Could you define it?

> ** International Part:
> 
> 3 news about the USA [Cheney saying that a new attack is a certainty;
> CIA trying to recover from the setbacks; the new Bin Laden video]

??!?!!? What new video?

> 1 news about Israel [another bomb-man]
> 
> 2 news about the Vatican [Pope asks for prayers for himself;
> with an interview with a Cardinal]
> 
> 1 news about East Timor [became a country yesterday]
> 
> 1 news about Colombia [fear of terrorist attacks in the election's eve]
> 
> ** Science/Life part
> 
> 4 brazilian news
> 
> 1 news about Argentina [pictures of Aconcagua]
> 
> 1 news about Greece [statue found]
> 
> ** Economy part
> 
> lots of local news
> 
> 1 news about Spain and Britain [Oil companies of Spain and
> British Airways have some problems...]
> 
> 1 news about Argentina [yawn... two more banks close]
> 
> 1 news about Spain [anti-globalization protest]
> 
> ** Conclusion
> 
> I think Europe might be as important to us as the USA - as there
> are about the same number of news for each side. So, you
> are right, because Britain and France together get less cover
> than the USA.
> 
> Alberto Monteiro


Thanks
Kevin T.

Reply via email to